Mar. 21st, 2006

pocketgarden: (Default)
Nita Abrams is one of my favorite romance authors. She's local, too, which I didn't realize until now. I've liked every one of her books, even when they're flawed, and buy them as soon as they come out. This one, however, was a disappointment.

First, I winced at the cover, the first Abrams book with a clinch. Eww. Then I winced at the back blurb, which sounded...cliché.

Unfortunately, it was. The history was interesting, as it always is in Abrams' books; unfortunately, the characters just weren't. Nathan Meyer has been a secondary character in several of her previous books, and was interesting there, but here he's a combination of two stock characters: the world-weary Regency spy, and the intimidating head-of-family-of-previous-characters. I kind of have the impression that the author was in love with him herself, and forgot to show the reader what was lovable about him. He just seemed flat.

The heroine, Abigail Hart, was the Sensible Widow, and maybe something of a Mary Sue. I liked her a lot at first, but she just seemed too sensible, and not very real. It's a bad sign when I prefer the unconcluded romance of the younger, stupider characters: at least her daughter and his nephew showed some growth.

There are also some plot problems, the major one being the setup: how could Nathan's brother tried to set him up with a woman without knowing the scandal about her, while she several times muses about how the gossip had circumscribed her life? While in the past I've felt Abrams was fairly reasonable in her use of the Regency Spy trope, this one was just off. It'd be a spoiler to say why. And that's another issue: half the reason Nathan came off so poorly was that the reader doesn't know what the hell he's doing for much of the book, and when finally All is Revealed it's just too much.

I like the vivid detail, the smooth writing, the use of Jewish characters in a Regency setting, the history (Napoleon's escape from Elba), the secondary characters... I just don't like the plot. Or the romance.

That's a not lot to like. I'll probably still get her next book, but I would not recommend this one unless you're already fond of Abrams' series.
pocketgarden: (Default)
I was slowly working my way through Tanya Huff's Blood Price, and wondering if the reason I wasn't reading much this year was that I was trying to finish it, when I misplaced the book.

In the middle of the climax.

I can't really bring myself to care.

So yup, Blood Price is pretty darned boring. It's predictable, and I object to the stereotyped characterization of the nerdy murderer, and I dislike the overly-symbolic-but-not-otherwise-real night blindness of the heroine, and I hate deadly dull flashbacks which stop the story so we can learn more about the ancient vampire. Oh, and the vampire writes romance novels, but that seemed overly symbolic and not very real, too.

I have liked other Tanya Huff books, but I'd say stay away from this one unless you really have a thing for cardboard vampires.


pocketgarden: (Default)

May 2012

27282930 31  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios